Treasury Issues Guidance on Buybacks. What Does It Mean For SPACs?
by Kristi Marvin on 2022-12-27 at 4:54pm

This morning the treasury department finally issued guidance around the issue of share buybacks, which has been haunting the capital markets since August when the 1% excise tax was first introduced. And in the nick of time too, since the tax goes into effect in less than week.

To be clear, the purpose of the excise tax was never about SPACs, they just got caught in its crosshairs thanks to the SPAC’s redemption feature. However, for some context around the situation, the 1% excise tax came about as part of the Inflation Reduction Bill that was passed this summer. Senator Kyrsten Sinema, in a last minute change, insisted the tax increase on carried interest for private equity be removed and instead, as a concession, the 1% excise tax on stock buybacks was put in.

On its surface, it appeared to be specifically meant for the typical share buyback you think of when corporations literally buy back their stock. However, all sorts of asset classes were caught up in it and affected such as redeemable preferreds and SPACs since a “redemption” is considered a buyback as well. There was quite a bit of confusion as to its interpretation and so, here we are today with the Treasury Department putting out some much needed guidance for how companies should proceed. However, in typical government fashion, it’s about as clear as a foggy windshield in blizzard.

Nonetheless, it appears that SPACs undergoing a “complete liquidation” will be spared the excise tax. To wit:

(i) Complete liquidations. 
 (A) General rule. Except as provided in section 3.04(4)(a)(v) of this notice, a distribution in complete liquidation of a covered corporation or a covered surrogate foreign corporation (as appropriate) to which § 331 or § 332(a) applies is not a repurchase by the covered corporation or the covered surrogate foreign corporation. 
 (B) Distributions during taxable year of complete liquidation and dissolution. 18 If a covered corporation or a covered surrogate foreign corporation (as appropriate) completely liquidates and dissolves (within the meaning of § 1.331-1(d)(1)(ii)) during a taxable year (that is, has a final distribution in complete liquidation to which § 331 applies during that taxable year), no distribution by that covered corporation or covered surrogate foreign corporation during that taxable year is a repurchase…
What is less clear is what happens in a partial redemption, i.e., at a shareholder vote for either extension or completion.  In those cases, the entire trust is not redeemed, only partially.  That is not well defined and so, we’re in yet another gray area.
Nonetheless, for SPACs that made a mad dash to liquidate before the December 31, 2022 excise tax deadline….well, apparently there was no need to rush. It looks like they will not be subject to the excise tax.  However, going forward, if “partial” redemptions via extension votes or completion votes do turn out to be subject to the tax (after we get further clarity), there could be another short term incentive for SPAC teams to opt to liquidate rather than press on. Meaning, if a SPAC team is running out of time, in a very difficult capital markets climate, and the option is to liquidate with no penalty or extend via shareholder vote and potentially be subject to a tax with average redemptions at votes hovering around 85%, which path is going to look more attractive?
Keep in mind, however, that this excise tax is only going to affect existing SPACs since any new SPACs that IPO will instead opt for an offshore domicile such as a Cayman or BVI. Foreign domiciled SPACs would not be subject to the excise tax. But, we still have roughly 384 SPACs still searching and another 148 that are announced. Of those, 281 are domestic SPACs that would potentially be affected.
So while today’s guidance is good news in that it appears to resolve the excise tax issue of what happens in a liquidation, there are still some questions and language that the auditors and lawyers need to parse.  Stay tuned as we try and gather more info.

 

Recent Posts
by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-03-14 at 8:17am

At the SPAC of Dawn The first wave of proposed SEC rules changes under the Trump administration touch upon SPACs in some unexpected ways and could portend at least a few years of peace between sponsors and their chief regulator. Earlier this month, the SEC announced that its Division of Corporation Finance would expand the...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-03-13 at 8:17am

At the SPAC of Dawn Following Wednesday’s positive CPI readings, the market is set to ingest both new jobless claims and Core PPI inflation numbers at 8:30 am ET. It might take a particularly rosy result to offset the many factors of market volatility recent. One new one got added to the bingo card this...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-03-12 at 3:48pm

One of the eternal questions surrounding SPACs has been their ability or inability to match the opportunity and the performance of the traditional IPO route, and it has become received wisdom on Wall Street that SPACs don’t match up. This is ostensibly born out in in the aggregate statistics that are frequently cited. But, downside...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-03-12 at 8:17am

At the SPAC of Dawn Despite the specter of recession looming, many of the hot technology sectors that SPACs favored during the boom times appear to be coming back on the menu. Ares II (NYSE:AACT) is reportedly angling to lock down a deal with an autonomous trucking firm. Northern Genesis II and Reinvent Y each...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-03-11 at 12:05pm

Cantor Equity Partners II (NASDAQ:CEPT) filed another warrantless SPAC showing that the firm will not be slowing down despite Cantor CEO Howard Lutnick moving his attentions to the administration. The new $200 million SPAC would join Cantor Equity Partners I (NASDAQ:CEPO), which became the first SPAC to IPO this year and Cantor Equity Partners (NASDAQ:CEP),...

logo

Copyright © 2025 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved