Additional Info on Pivotal’s Backstop
by Kristi Marvin on 2019-11-13 at 2:14pm

Yesterday, Pivotal Acquisition Corp. (PVT),  announced that it had entered into a commitment letter with MGG Investment Group, LP (“MGG”), where Pivotal may borrow up to $150 million of 5-year convertible notes, thus providing a backstop to their business combination with KLDiscovery.  However, there seemed to be some confusion as to just “how much” they’re backstopping.

If you looked at the proxy that was filed the same day, there was language within it that implied the $150 million convertible note was IN ADDITION to the $50 million forward purchase agreement (also with MGG), which would have provided for up to $200 million of backstop, less transaction expenses of ~$19 million.  For instance:

“(b)    the term “Available Closing Date Cash” means, as of immediately prior to the Closing, an aggregate amount equal to the result of (without duplication): (i) the cash available to be released from the Trust Account and the aggregate net cash proceeds actually received from any investment in Parent approved after the date hereof pursuant to Section 4.1(f), including up to $50,000,000 pursuant to the Forward Purchase Contract (if any), minus (ii) the aggregate amount of all redemptions of Parent Common Stock by any Redeeming Stockholders; minus (iii) the Outstanding Parent Expensesminus (iv) to the extent not included in the Outstanding Parent Expenses, the sum of all outstanding deferred, unpaid or contingent underwriting, broker’s or similar fees, commissions or expenses owed by Parent or any other party to the extent Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is responsible for or obligated to reimburse or repay any such amounts, minus (v) the aggregate amount outstanding under all indebtedness for borrowed money of Parent or Merger Sub (including any Parent Borrowings);”

However, it has now been suggested (on good authority) that the new $150 million convertible note should be considered “in lieu” of the $50 million forward purchase and the language was just a hold over from a previous filing.  As a result, Pivotal would need $25 million to remain in trust in order to satisfy the $175 million available cash at closing condition ($175M – $150M = $25M).  That’s not “fully backstopped”, but it’s still a pretty good backstop for a $233 million SPAC.

However, there’s still an itch that needs to be scratched – are the transaction expenses to be included or excluded? There seems to be a consensus among the SPAC community that it’s not included and Pivotal only need $25 million in trust post-vote.  Maybe we’ll get a revised proxy where they clean up the language so we can all have final clarity.  Additionally, maybe they left in the $50 million Forward Purchase Agreement language in case they need to use it (in a worst case scenario where redemptions leave less than $25 million remaining in trust).

For now, everyone is working with the $25 million cash left in trust post-redemptions figure.  If that changes, an update will be provided.

 

 

Recent Posts
by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-02-04 at 7:08pm

K&F Growth Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:KFIIU) announced the pricing of its $250 million IPO and its units are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “KFIIU”, Wednesday, February 5, 2025. The new SPAC intends to combine with a target company in the experiential entertainment industry underpinned by strong secular growth, a skilled...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-02-04 at 12:06pm

Rithm Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:RAC.U) has filed for a $200 million SPAC with a loaded room of underwriters to hunt down a target in financial services or real estate. The Rithm team has driven aggressive terms for the sponsor’s first SPAC with the help of a deep-pocketed backer and the trio of Citigroup, BTIG and USB...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-02-04 at 8:19am

At the SPAC of Dawn  With the North American tariff threats set aside for now, there’s still plenty of momentum for the sorts of investments that might be able to dodge such trade disputes, or become more valuable should trade barriers arise. Among the clearest examples of these are producers of critical materials like rare...

by Henrique Santa Rosa, CFA on 2025-02-03 at 3:37pm

In January 2025, SPAC teams continued extending beyond their third round, with one SPAC notably reaching its seventh extension vote as they searched for suitable deals. The month saw five announcements, marking the highest level in recent months, while only four SPACs held completion votes. Extension Votes In January, 14 extension votes were scheduled, representing...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-02-03 at 8:15am

At the SPAC of Dawn  February is set to start with the jolt of a new potential trade war in North America. While some observers had expected tough trade action on China, the incoming administration’s decision to begin with 25% tariffs on the US’ biggest trading partners and neighbors, Mexico and Canada, and tariffs of...

logo

Copyright © 2023 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved