NASDAQ Issues FAQs on New Liquidity Standards
by Kristi Marvin on 2019-07-31 at 9:06pm

Carol Anne Huff, from Kirkland & Ellis, is back, once again, to help provide some much needed clarity on the recent Nasdaq rule changes that are set to go into effect starting next Monday, August 5th.  In light of these changes, the Nasdaq recently put out some FAQs in an effort to clear up any outstanding questions.  Read below for Carol Anne’s interpretation of the newly released information and how it will affect SPACs going forward.

If you’d like to read up on Carol Anne’s initial assessment of the Nasdaq rule changes, go HERE.
If you would like to read her previous two-part series as a refresher, you can read Part I HERE and Part II HERE.)  


NASDAQ Issues FAQs on New Liquidity Standards

What do SPACs need to do for privately placed shares to be treated as “unrestricted”?

By: Carol Anne Huff, Kirkland & Ellis LLP*

Nasdaq’s new liquidity listing standards go into effect in a few days on August 5th.  Nasdaq has provided some important guidance today in the form of FAQs that will help SPACs answer the question on everyone’s mind – What needs to be done to have privately placed shares count as “unrestricted” at the time of the business combination?

Although Nasdaq’s definition of “restricted securities” broadly picks up any securities considered “restricted securities” under U.S. Federal securities laws, Nasdaq’s FAQs clarify that shares registered for resale on a shelf registration statement can be treated as “unrestricted” if certain conditions are met.

Specifically, the issuer and the holder must have taken all steps required to permit the shares to be freely transferred.  The FAQ states that “…if a company provides, and the transfer agent accepts, a blanket opinion permitting the resale of those securities in the future, and there are no other actions that the company or investor must take to remove the restrictive legend on the securities, Nasdaq would not consider the securities to be ‘Restricted Securities’.

This clarification is good news for SPACs. It makes clear that an issuer need only provide a blanket opinion that shares can be sold pursuant to the registration statement and the legends removed upon sale.  This keeps issuers (and their lawyers) from being placed in the tricky situation of removing legends from restricted securities prior to the shares actually being sold pursuant to the registration statement.

Because it is the transfer pursuant to the registration statement that causes shares to be unrestricted for federal securities law purposes, until sold, the shares technically would remain restricted.  Issuers (and their counsel) are generally not willing to remove legends in advance of an actual sale or contemplated sale transaction.  Nasdaq’s position reflects a good deal of pragmatism.  After all, once the shares are registered for resale and an opinion on file with the transfer agent, there is no reason those shares should be treated as illiquid.

As discussed in my July 10th post, Nasdaq has informally indicated that SPACs that are merely continuing a listing, should continue to benefit from Nasdaq’s normal delisting process.  This should give those SPACs more time to have a shelf registration statement effective post-closing.  However, SPACs effecting their business combination through a new holdco (which you can tell because a newly-formed entity files a Form S-4 in addition to the SPAC’s proxy statement) will presumably need to have a shelf registration statement effective at closing in order for any PIPE shares to count as “unrestricted.”  This will be a change in practice because PIPE subscription agreements generally have not required SPACs to file a registration statement to permit resale of PIPE securities until post-closing.

Unfortunately, SPACs with an approaching closing date may have trouble having a shelf registration statement effective at closing.  If important to meeting the liquidity standards, this could mean pushing out their expected closing dates.

*Carol Anne Huff is a partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP and regularly advises clients on transactions involving special purpose acquisition companies.

 

Recent Posts
by Kristi Marvin on 2025-05-31 at 10:02am

Terms Tracker for the Week Ending May 30, 2025 Welcome to our weekly column where we discuss the findings from our IPO terms tracker based on the previous week’s pricings. May went out with a bang. Four more IPOs priced this week, bringing the monthly tally to 22 and the YTD total to 53. That...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-05-30 at 2:55pm

June is set to be one of the quietest months in some time in terms of sponsors and de-SPAC’d companies coming free from their lock-ups, owing to the quieter periods for transactions closing that occurred six and 12 months ago. Up first will be company shareholders for East Asian media conglomerate TNL Mediagene (NASDAQ:TNMG) on...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-05-30 at 12:37pm

Pioneer I (NASDAQ:PACHU) has filed for a $220 million SPAC to hunt for a healthcare target with a mix of industry veterans heading up its team. The new SPAC is the 12th new S-1 underwritten by Cantor Fitzgerald this year as left lead as it hopes to join the 10 SPACs that the underwriter has...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-05-30 at 8:24am

At the SPAC of Dawn This week comes to an end with a flurry of SPAC votes including three special meetings called for shareholders to approve business combinations. Aetherium (OTC:GMFI) was also scheduled to seek shareholder approval for its extension proposal, but has punted this vote for two weeks to June 13. Two of today’s...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-05-29 at 8:22am

At the SPAC of Dawn After multiple days of market rallies, traders are set to ingest a full plate of economic indicators today with jobless claims coming first, followed by a GDP growth revisions, home sales and a raft of Fed comments. GDP figures for the first quarter are broadly forecast to be revised downward...

logo

Copyright © 2025 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved