“Q2 Kickoff SPACs”: A Comparison of Terms
by Kristi Marvin on 2019-04-02 at 12:00pm

To kick off the quarter, we have three SPACs currently getting ready to IPO and since SPACs tend to price in groups, another “comparison of terms” seemed warranted.  To state the obvious, we’re going to call these three the “Q2 Kickoff SPACs”.

As always, the SPACs are listed by size, left to right.  However, you will notice that all three are 100% in trust, 1/2 warrant structures.  In fact, of the last six SPACs to price, all had 100% in trust and 1/2 warrant structures, with the exception of Tuscan Holdings, which had a full warrant.  Commanding 1/3 of warrant has gotten a lot harder in the past two months and would appear only reserved for A+++ teams such as of the “Gores Metropoulos” caliber.

April SPACs 2

Focusing on the two larger-sized SPACs – Iswill and Replay – the only obvious difference is the duration of the SPAC.  18 months for Iswill and 24 months for Replay. Other than that, the headline terms are amazing similar.  So what is the difference?  Sector focus and team for sure.

If you read Iswill’s proposed business section in their prospectus, the team makes a compelling argument for focusing on the technology/software sector and more importantly, they are focusing on companies in the sub $1 billion range, the “almost unicorns”. As we’ve discussed previously, a SPAC with a warrant overhang and questionable amount left in trust post-vote is probably not the most attractive route to getting public for a unicorn (although Churchill really knocked it out of the park).  However, Iswill makes a strong case for tech/software companies in the $500 million to $1 billion range. And as a side note: whoever wrote the business section did a nice job. Well done.

On the other hand, Replay is focusing on companies in Argentina and Brazil.  Plus, if you’re going to be looking in South America, Replay has a very strong and experienced management team in that area (led by Edmond Safra and Gregorio and Gerardo Werthein). However, the political instability in that region is certainly a concern.  Additionally, while 18 months is always going to look more attractive to investors (and it’s where Iswill has an edge), 24 months is probably very necessary to complete a deal in South America. That may account for the $25 million intended purchase of units in the IPO by the Sponsors.  They needed to pay up to get that 24 months.

Looking at B. Riley Principal Merger Corp., it’s another bank-sponsored SPAC in the vein of CF Finance and Chardan Healthcare. However, this SPAC has a general/broad focus where they can pursue a combination in any industry or geographic region, but intend to focus on businesses in the $300 million to $1 billion EV range.  Again, this team has a ton of experience (you have to these days), but in my opinion, it’s gotten a lot harder to tell a compelling story and demonstrate an effective strategy without having a targeted sector focus.  This is because investors have gotten a lot more savvy about SPACs.  Plus, since there are so many SPACs right now (64 searching with 3 on file) that investors have gotten a lot choosier.  A team really needs to make a persuasive pitch and not having a sector focus makes that pitch considerably more difficult to point to actionable opportunities.  Having said that, a great track record does help.

On the whole, all of these SPACs look attractive.  Both Iswill and Replay probably edge out B. Riley’s SPAC simply for having a targeted sector focus, but you can’t go wrong with owning any of these.   As far as which of Iswill and Replay has the edge, it has to come down to personal preference of sector.  Iswill’s strategy caught my attention just a little bit more than Replay’s, but honestly…it’s pretty close.

Look for Replay to be the first out of the gate with pricing tomorrow night for trading Thursday, April 4th.  Iswill and B. Riley should follow late next week.

 

Recent Posts
by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-28 at 7:47am

At the SPAC of Dawn Fed Chair Jerome Powell has given new hints that the administration would be showing greater levels of comfort with inflation if a cut could help improve unemployment numbers. Those numbers could get an update today at 8:30 am ET to bring new jobless claims as well as final prices for...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-27 at 1:31pm

News and Rumors CNBC: Former WeWork (OTC Pink:WEWKQ) founder Adam Neumann has offered to buy back control of the company for $500 million but has yet to secure the necessary financing. WeWork went public with BowX in October 2021. PR: Satellite telecom firm Spire Global (NYSE:SPIR) has signed an agreement to build and launch two...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-27 at 11:38am

Bannix (NASDAQ:BNIX) has entered into a definitive agreement to combine with VisionWave Technologies for $30 million. The combined company is expected to trade on the Nasdaq once the deal is completed with an initial outside date of September 14. Transaction Overview Bannix has about $17 million in its trust after seeing 77.4% of its shares...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-27 at 7:33am

At the SPAC of Dawn Much of the attention yesterday was on tracking the swings of the newly-completed Trump Media (NASDAQ:DJT) deal with the FT going as far to suggest it may “make SPACs great again.” Not all of the day’s data points were on the positive side of the ledger, however. IB Acquisition Corp....

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-26 at 1:52pm

News and Rumors SpaceNews: Boeing (NYSE:BA) has sued Virgin Galactic (NASDAQ:SPCE) alleging the space tourism venture refused to pay $25 million it owed for design work and violated Boeing’s intellectual property rights. Virgin Galactic combined with Social Capital Hedosophia in 2019. Bloomberg: The most popular options contract for Trump Media (NASDAQ:DJT) predicts it to plunge...

logo

Copyright © 2023 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved