Avista Public Healthcare Fails Vote to Extend and Will Liquidate
by Kristi Marvin on 2018-10-30 at 8:38pm

Avista Was Just Kidding…Their Vote Didn’t Pass.

Avista Healthcare Public Acquisition Corp., announced late Tuesday afternoon that not only did their originially approved extension proposal vote not get passed, but that they are liquidating due to an error in the voting process which, according to AHPA’s charter requires 100% participation in the extension vote.  This feels a little like the U.S. electoral process in that …”oh, you ‘technically won’ but according to the rules, you lost.  Sorry, and we’re taking all your money.” To be clear, Avista’s vote was 30,179,230 “for“, 2,202,225 “against“, and 2,438,000 “abstained“.

All of this is surprising news for a number of reasons.  First, AHPA held their extension vote on October 4th, and on that same date announced the proposal to extend had passed.  Today’s announcement revised that result and announced the disapproval of the vote and AHPA’s liquidation due to an error in the voting standard.

Per the 8-K:

The Original 8-K reported that Proposal 1 – To authorize an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (the “Articles”) to extend the date by which the Company has to consummate a business combination from October 14, 2018 to February 15, 2019 (“Proposal 1”), was approved at the EGM, based on the Company’s application of a voting standard requiring approval by a vote of at least two thirds of the ordinary shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the EGM (voting together as a single class). The voting standard we applied was incorrect. Pursuant to the Articles, the correct voting standard for Proposal 1 required affirmative votes in respect of 100% of all shares entitled to vote.

Further to that….

“The proposal was not approved, having not received “for” votes from 100% of all shareholders entitled to vote.”

“In connection with this vote, the holders of 30,798,019 Class A ordinary shares exercised their right under the Articles to redeem their shares for cash at a redemption price of approximately $10.20 per share, for an aggregate redemption amount of approximately $314,258,591.61, in the event that the proposal was approved.  As a result of the Company’s error with respect to the application of the prescribed voting standard, these shares were redeemed on October 4, 2018, which was in advance of the date required by the Articles. As a result of Proposal 1 not being approved, such shares were subject to mandatory redemption within ten business days of October 14, 2018 pursuant to the Articles.”

Here’s where it gets crazy….

“In addition, the 201,981 Class A ordinary shares that were sold in the Company’s initial public offering that remained outstanding after the holders of such shares elected not to be redeemed in the aforementioned redemption (the “public shares”) are also subject to mandatory redemption pursuant to the requirements of the Articles. Due to additional interest having accrued in the trust account since October 4, 2018, these shares will be redeemed for approximately $10.30 per share, for an aggregate redemption amount of approximately $2,081,520.”

What does this mean?  Well, for starters, the shareholders who either forgot to redeem or for whatever reason didn’t redeem at the extension vote, just got an additional $0.10 extra at liquidation, proving the lazy man’s theory that doing nothing is better than doing something.

Secondly, it means every single SPAC and shareholder should check their charter to see what their rules are.  Seriously.  How this slipped past everyone involved is crazy.  Shouldn’t the fact that a necessary 100% vote be fact #1 before going to a vote?

In the end, the shares that voted to redeem at the extension vote received $10.20 per share. And the shares that didn’t vote will receive $10.30 per share due to additional interest. And this SPAC liquidates.

Regardless, the end result doesn’t feel good.  This should have been better.  Avista should have been a winner from the start and it’s a warning sign to future SPACs.  Take heed.

 

Recent Posts
by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-28 at 7:47am

At the SPAC of Dawn Fed Chair Jerome Powell has given new hints that the administration would be showing greater levels of comfort with inflation if a cut could help improve unemployment numbers. Those numbers could get an update today at 8:30 am ET to bring new jobless claims as well as final prices for...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-27 at 1:31pm

News and Rumors CNBC: Former WeWork (OTC Pink:WEWKQ) founder Adam Neumann has offered to buy back control of the company for $500 million but has yet to secure the necessary financing. WeWork went public with BowX in October 2021. PR: Satellite telecom firm Spire Global (NYSE:SPIR) has signed an agreement to build and launch two...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-27 at 11:38am

Bannix (NASDAQ:BNIX) has entered into a definitive agreement to combine with VisionWave Technologies for $30 million. The combined company is expected to trade on the Nasdaq once the deal is completed with an initial outside date of September 14. Transaction Overview Bannix has about $17 million in its trust after seeing 77.4% of its shares...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-27 at 7:33am

At the SPAC of Dawn Much of the attention yesterday was on tracking the swings of the newly-completed Trump Media (NASDAQ:DJT) deal with the FT going as far to suggest it may “make SPACs great again.” Not all of the day’s data points were on the positive side of the ledger, however. IB Acquisition Corp....

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-03-26 at 1:52pm

News and Rumors SpaceNews: Boeing (NYSE:BA) has sued Virgin Galactic (NASDAQ:SPCE) alleging the space tourism venture refused to pay $25 million it owed for design work and violated Boeing’s intellectual property rights. Virgin Galactic combined with Social Capital Hedosophia in 2019. Bloomberg: The most popular options contract for Trump Media (NASDAQ:DJT) predicts it to plunge...

logo

Copyright © 2023 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved