Side-by-Side Comparison of the Twelve Seas and LF Capital SPAC IPOs
by Kristi Marvin on 2018-06-20 at 8:43am

Twelve Seas Prices an Upsized $180 Million IPO and LF Capital Prices $135 Million IPO

Last night, both Twelve Seas Investment Company and LF Capital Acquisition Corp. priced their initial public offerings and will begin trading today under the symbols TWLVU and LFACU, respectively.

Both SPACs were of a similar size (as of yesterday), but Twelve Seas did a surprise upsize to $180 million, whereas LF Capital raised $135 million in total gross proceeds.  I thought it would interesting to see a side by side comparison of terms to demonstrate the differences in structure and why some SPACs are able to upsize their offerings.  To be clear, an upsized offering does not  mean one deal is better than the other.  It does show investor interest or more specifically, institutional interest.  However, quality of offering and investor interest are sometimes not aligned. Let’s take a look.

Twelve SeasLF Capital
Sector FocusPan-Eurasian RegionFintech
Initial Filing $mm$100.0$135.0
Last Amended S-1 $mm$150.0$135.0
Final Gross Proceeds Raised $mm$180.0$135.0
% Held in Trust / Per Unit100% / $10.00102% / $10.20
Backstop?NoYes
Anchor Investor?NoYes
Sponsor Private PlacementUnitsWarrants
Shares11
Warrants11
Rights10
# Months to Complete1824
UnderwritersEarlyBirdCapital / I-BankersB.Riley / Raymond James

As you can see, the real difference between Twelve Seas and LF Capital comes down to three items:

  • Unit structure:  In addition to one Share and one Warrant, Twelve Seas is offering a Right.  LF is not.
    • Offering a Right in addition to the Share and Warrant means additional potential upside to unit holders. Another “free look”.
  • Time horizon: Twelve Seas is offering a shorter time period to complete an acquisition (18 months vs. 24 months for LF Capital).
    • As an investor, institutional or otherwise, a shorter time period means a faster return on investment.
  • Backstop/Anchor Investor:  Twelve Seas does not have a Backstop/Anchor Investor. LF has BlackRock Funds acting as Backstop/Anchor.
    • Having a backstop and anchor means less negotiating power for institutions at the time of conversion/redemption.  By virtually guaranteeing the combination will close, the SPAC has more leverage for determining the conversion/redemption price even if the announced transaction is a so-so to below average deal. 

But here’s the real difference: All three of the above terms mean that as an investor, the terms are more favorable for Twelve Seas.  BUT… if you’re a SPAC management team, LF Capital’s terms are slightly more favorable to the SPAC.  Which is why LF had to put additional at-risk capital into the trust to bring the percentage up to 102% to get investors into the deal. To explain further, LF has an extra six month cushion for completing a transaction, they don’t have the added headache of a Right in their capital structure, AND they have a backstop investor to protect the cash in trust at closing.

So again, determining which structure is more appealing really depends on which side of the table you sit. Are you an investor or SPAC management?  Luckily, as a SPAC, there are a number of different term-levers you can pull or push to get your SPAC where you and your investors need it to be.  In the end, both of these two SPACs raised a good amount of capital and everybody wins. For now.

The clock just started ticking….

Congratulations to Twelve Seas and LF Capital.

Underwriters for Twelve Seas:  EarlyBirdCapital Inc., I-Bankers Securities, Inc.
Underwriters for LF Capital: B. Riley FBR, Raymond James

 

Recent Posts
by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-04-18 at 11:50am

AGBA (NASDAQ:AGBA) stock is up over +90% this morning following a +211% premarket spike on news it has signed a definitive agreement to combine with social streaming video platform Triller. AGBA, the company itself, was formed by the $555 million combination between a SPAC of the same name and TAG Companies, a financial services firm...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-04-18 at 7:57am

At the SPAC of Dawn Since closing its combination with DHC last month, AI customer engagement firm BEN (NASDAQ:BNAI) has rolled out new partnerships with call center and healthcare clients. And, while it faces a fair bit of competition in the chatbot realm, several high-profile institutions have demonstrated that creating one that provides useful services...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-04-17 at 3:05pm

Blue Ocean (NASDAQ:BOCN) provided significantly more texture today in the presentation for its $275 million combination with Asian digital media group TNL Mediagene, which it expects to hit profitability in the second half of the year despite a slight shakeup in financing for the transaction. The first big update in the first investor deck is...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-04-17 at 8:13am

At the SPAC of Dawn A brand new market may have just opened up for space de-SPACs as NASA administrator Bill Nelson announced a shift in the agency’s $11 billion program for a mission to return samples from Mars. Rather than rely on the agency’s internal technologies that would be predicted to get a sample...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-04-16 at 11:33am

Overall deal flow between SPACs and biotech firms has slowed over the last year, but some pending FDA changes could breathe new life into particular business models within the space. In particular, the FDA has asked Congress as part of its 2025 Legislative Proposals to eliminate the interchangeability designation for biosimilar medications, claiming the existing...

logo

Copyright © 2023 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved